Title: Three Authors File Class-Action Lawsuit Against Nvidia for Alleged Unauthorized Use of Copyrighted Works in ai Platform, NeMo
In an unprecedented move that could set a significant legal precedent in the realm of artificial intelligence (ai), three acclaimed authors have initiated a lawsuit against chipmaker Nvidia. The dispute centers around Nvidia’s ai platform, NeMo, which the plaintiffs – Brian Keene, Abdi Nazemian, and Stewart O’Nan – claim, has utilized their copyrighted books without permission for training purposes.
The authors’ grievance lies in NeMo’s utilization of a dataset of nearly 200,000 books, allegedly including their works, to mimic natural language writing. Noteworthily, Nvidia removed this dataset in October 2023 due to copyright infringement claims, an action the authors perceive as a tacit admission of guilt.
Filed in a San Francisco federal court, the proposed class-action lawsuit seeks unspecified damages for US authors whose copyrighted works might have contributed to NeMo’s large language models in the past three years. The lawsuit specifically names titles like Keene’s “Ghost Walk” (2008), Nazemian’s “Like a Love Story” (2019), and O’Nan’s “Last Night at the Lobster” (2007). As of Sunday, Nvidia declined to comment on the matter, while the authors’ lawyers haven’t responded to requests for further information.
Background: The Growing Controversy Over Generative ai and Intellectual Property
This lawsuit marks another instance where companies involved in the development of generative ai technology face legal challenges from writers and media giants such as the New York Times. Generative ai is a burgeoning technology capable of producing new content based on existing text, images, and sounds. However, the issue lies in determining who owns the intellectual property rights to such creations.
The lawsuit against Nvidia comes as a significant blow to the tech industry, particularly given its potential implications for other companies working on similar ai technologies. Previous controversies surrounding the use of copyrighted material in ai models have primarily involved media organizations such as the New York Times and Getty Images, which have threatened lawsuits against ai developers for unauthorized use of their intellectual property.
The Implications: A New Frontier in Intellectual Property Laws and ai Ethics
This lawsuit sets a new precedent for intellectual property laws as they pertain to generative ai technology. It could potentially lead to significant changes in how ai companies approach copyrighted material and the ethical implications of using such content without explicit consent from the original creators.
Moreover, this legal action could have far-reaching consequences for authors and other creators whose works might unknowingly be used to train ai models. The potential damages sought in this lawsuit could lead to a significant financial burden for Nvidia and potentially other companies involved in developing generative ai technologies.
Stay tuned as we continue to monitor this developing story and provide updates on any new developments or responses from Nvidia. In the meantime, it is essential to consider the implications of these legal actions for both the ai industry and the broader intellectual property landscape.
RELATED:
* NVIDIA Introduces Cloud G-SYNC Technology to Enhance Cloud Gaming Experience [Link]
* Apple Could Lose Its Prestigious Title to NVIDIA If It Disappoints in GenAI [Link]
* Get $100 OFF on Xiaomi 14 Pro at Giztop (1TB Variant) [Link]
* Redmi K70 Pro Available for Discounted Price of $499 [Link]
* Best of MWC 2024: ai Phone, Transparent Laptop, 3D Tablet & More [Link]